Skip to main content

History Will Not Absolve You

While the children of Operation Pedro Pan celebrate the death of tyrant, over the weekend the history revisionists, for the sake of contrarianism have tried to salvage something of Castro's legacy. If you're one of those people, please don't bother. Anybody who reads the Amnesty International report in the last year of Castro's reign, if he's honest enough will quickly give up any support for the communist regime he ran in Cuba. 

Castro came to public notoriety with the backing of the United States when he first attempted to overthrew the military coup under Batista in 1953. Cubans had be reeling for change ever since the Spanish-American war and Castro capitalised on their desperation but what replaced it was far short of liberation.

It wasn't difficult to turn people against Batista (who himself usurped power in 1952) and Castro had gained international attention when he lead a failed attack in Santiago De Cuba against a Cuban military base. Released after just two years of prison, he would leave the country with his brother Raul to raise money in Miami and build forces in Mexico to organize another invasion.  

Hindsight is a great thing, televising Castro's trial transformed his handful of supporters into a revolution that rallied the country. After he returned to Cuba with Che Guevara in 1956 he was able to gain even further support among the poorer factions of the country. Our second mistake came after Castro took power, the embargo that followed his assent became the greatest resource for Castro to continue both the regime and the police state. "Its not socialism that fails Cuba it's the blockade".

Being one of the few to impose communism from within the country sans an invasion from the Soviets, Castro would never willingly concede defeat. When the US became unwilling to trade with Cuba, Guevara who became head of the Cuban national bank signed a trade deal with the Soviet Union. Their subsidies propped up the Cuban economy until the end of the Cold war which, after an abrupt end brought them to the brink of famine. Still even when Castro resigned, a decade and a half later the economy was stagnant and income per head was lower than most of Latin America but as one of the richest men alive I can't help but notice he didn't do so bad.

Castro was a master of propaganda, inviting film makers and journalists to follow his revolution, that promised social democracy and political reform. It undoubtedly brought hope to many people but the reality of his eventual struggle into power was communism, the forceful redistribution of land (and private companies) and dictatorship.

Soon "Elecciones y que" became the mantra "Elecctiones y que", "Elections so what". It was understandable why the Americans imposed the blockade, even though I feel it was the wrong thing to do. But before Castro could build relations with the Soviet Union, he would sink even lower. He publicly opposed the Prague spring, the Velvet Revolution that would overthrow dictatorship in Czechslovakia and reestablish itself as an independent democratic state. In part this was just a political move but it wasn't unlike him to support a totalitarian ideology, not only in Cuba and Prague but also through his backing of both the IRA and the FARC.

The La Coubre explosion, the bay of pigs and the CIA assassination attempts on Castro life were all exploited for justification to bring Cuba closer to a Soviet style regime. Though supporters would try and redeem him some favor by reminding us he opposed South African apartheid but it's not as though the man really cared for the proletariat over political power.

He never submitted himself to the ballot box and not one election was ever held in Cuba. The polity didn't even have the pretense of being a democracy. Opposition parties are banned, dissidents are imprisoned or exiled, hostile media was shut down, the Cuban administration was filled with friends and family and Cubans remain unable to travel abroad or even to parts of their own country where tourism is popular.

Let us also not forget, that some of the darkest in word history came in 1961 with American missiles in Turkey and Soviet missiles "on that imprisoned island" in Cuba, (which Castro wanted to use) we came to the edge of a nuclear holocaust.

Nothing is more unpalatable than listening to a socialist born and raised in the Anglo sphere argue that this is somehow justified by the number of hospitals they produce or their education system being better than other countries

Castro has failed Cuba and even on his death bed it remains illegal to discuss the economy, to write letters to the government, to report on political developments, to speak to international reporters, to advocate human rights, to visit friends and relatives outside your local area without government permission. Cubans are arrested without warrants, and prosecuted for failing to denounce fellow citizens or for "other acts against state security" which broadens as far as Castro's taste.

Still we can only hope one day to celebrate liberty and freedom in Cuba. 


  1. It's also worth noting that both health and education were significantly better compared to the rest of the world before Castro ever rose to power. Cuba had the second largest number of physicians per person in Latin America according to UN statistics in 1958. In that same year they also had 13.5 per cent higher rate of students per 1,000 in habitants. Second only to the United States.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

William Lane Craig and the Hartle-Hawking No Boundary Proposal

Classical standard hot Big Bang cosmology represents the universe as beginning from a singular dense point, with no prior description or explanation of classical spacetime. Quantum cosmology is different in that it replaces the initial singularity with a description in accord with some law the "quantum mechanical wave function of the universe", different approaches to quantum cosmology differ in their appeal either to describe the origin of the material content of the universe e.g., Tyron 1973, Linde 1983a, Krauss 2012 or the origin of spacetime itself e.g., Vilenkin 1982, Linde 1983b, Hartle-Hawking 1983, Vilenkin 1984.

These last few proposals by Vilenkin, Hartle-Hawking and others are solutions to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation and exist in a category of proposals called "quantum gravity cosmologies" which make cosmic applications of an approach to quantum gravity called "closed dynamic triangulation" or CDT (also known as Euclidean quantum gravity). I&#…

How Should Thatcherites Remember the '80s?

Every now and again, when I talk to people about the '80s I'm told that it was a time of unhinged selfishness, that somehow or other we learned the price of everything but the value of nothing. I can just remember that infamous line from Billy Elliot; 'Merry Christmas Maggie Thatcher. We all celebrate today because its one day closer to your death'. If it reflected the general mood of the time, one might wonder how it is she won, not one but three elections.

In an era when a woman couldn't be Prime Minister and a working class radical would never lead the Conservative party, Thatcher was both and her launch into power was almost accidental owing in part to Manchester liberals and the Winter of Discontent. Yet I'm convinced her election victory in '79 was the only one that ever truly mattered. Simply consider the calamity of what preceded it, the 1970s was a decade of double-digit inflation, power cuts, mass strikes, price and income controls, and the three…

Creation Of Universes from Nothing

The above paper "Creation of Universes from Nothing" was published in 1982, which was subsequently followed up in 1984 by a paper titled "Quantum Creation of Universes". I decided it would be a good idea to talk about these proposals, since last time I talked about the Hartle-Hawking model which was, as it turns out, inspired by the above work. 
Alexander Vilenkin also explains in a non-technical way the essential idea in his book; Many World's in One – one of the best books I've ever read – it mostly covers cosmic inflationary theory but the 17th chapter covers how inflation may have begun. In fact Vilenkin is one of the main preponderant who helped develop inflation along with Steinhardt, Guth, Hawking, Starobinsky, Linde and others. 
Although I won't talk about it here, Vilenkin also discovered a way of doing cosmology by using something called "topological defects" and he has been known for work he's done on cosmic strings, too.
In ex…